🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states exercised their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iranian officials said the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if talks resume.

The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Final Resolution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always sought to dictate their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the final resolution to address conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the same language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this assault."